NBT editing of .dat and .mca files.
Suggesting the ability to edit.dat and.mca files in the files tab of the panel instead of having to download them and then use a tool like NBTExplorer. Suggesting maybe a warning to people editing these files before you can open them and/or forcing servers to be offline before editing these because it can cause corruption.
Nexusen38 4 days ago
💡 Feature Request
NBT editing of .dat and .mca files.
Suggesting the ability to edit.dat and.mca files in the files tab of the panel instead of having to download them and then use a tool like NBTExplorer. Suggesting maybe a warning to people editing these files before you can open them and/or forcing servers to be offline before editing these because it can cause corruption.
Nexusen38 4 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Allow limited hybrid proxy usage for UltraServers-hosted proxies
Hi UltraServers team, I understand and agree with the intent behind the current proxy restrictions, especially preventing abuse of your DDoS protection and bandwidth to shield third-party infrastructure. That makes sense and is a real problem in the hosting space. That said, the current "all endpoints must be on UltraServers" rule effectively prevents legitimate hybrid Minecraft network setups. Many established networks (including mine) host their main production backends on UltraServers, while keeping smaller components such as lobbies, limbo, private, prototype, or development servers on lower-cost server (or VPS) providers. Databases and Redis are also often external for better resilience and portability. Because of this, I can't practically use an UltraServers-hosted Velocity proxy today (even as an additional entry point on multi-proxy setup) since players would be unable to reach those auxiliary servers without me violating the terms of service. This creates an all-or-nothing requirement that feels more like vendor lock-in than abuse prevention, and ironically discourages adoption of UltraServers’ proxy services (which could even help indirectly promotes UltraServers itself). Suggestion: consider an optional, restricted "hybrid proxy" allowance, for example: Allow a limited amount of off-network backend traffic (e.g. smaller bandwidth threshold). Apply monitoring, warnings, and enforcement if external routing becomes excessive or appears to be abuse (DDoS offloading, traffic laundering, etc.). This would still protect UltraServers from misuse, while supporting real-world network architectures and making UltraServers proxies viable for more advanced customers. I believe this kind of controlled allowance would strike a better balance between abuse prevention and flexibility. I'd even happily pay extra for this feature. Thanks for considering the feedback.
An Anonymous User 4 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Allow limited hybrid proxy usage for UltraServers-hosted proxies
Hi UltraServers team, I understand and agree with the intent behind the current proxy restrictions, especially preventing abuse of your DDoS protection and bandwidth to shield third-party infrastructure. That makes sense and is a real problem in the hosting space. That said, the current "all endpoints must be on UltraServers" rule effectively prevents legitimate hybrid Minecraft network setups. Many established networks (including mine) host their main production backends on UltraServers, while keeping smaller components such as lobbies, limbo, private, prototype, or development servers on lower-cost server (or VPS) providers. Databases and Redis are also often external for better resilience and portability. Because of this, I can't practically use an UltraServers-hosted Velocity proxy today (even as an additional entry point on multi-proxy setup) since players would be unable to reach those auxiliary servers without me violating the terms of service. This creates an all-or-nothing requirement that feels more like vendor lock-in than abuse prevention, and ironically discourages adoption of UltraServers’ proxy services (which could even help indirectly promotes UltraServers itself). Suggestion: consider an optional, restricted "hybrid proxy" allowance, for example: Allow a limited amount of off-network backend traffic (e.g. smaller bandwidth threshold). Apply monitoring, warnings, and enforcement if external routing becomes excessive or appears to be abuse (DDoS offloading, traffic laundering, etc.). This would still protect UltraServers from misuse, while supporting real-world network architectures and making UltraServers proxies viable for more advanced customers. I believe this kind of controlled allowance would strike a better balance between abuse prevention and flexibility. I'd even happily pay extra for this feature. Thanks for considering the feedback.
An Anonymous User 4 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Add API and docs for System Backups
Pterodactyl Panel have API to get list of backups and the detail ( https://pterodactyl-api-docs.netvpx.com/docs/api/client/backups#list-backups). In UltraServers, this is the “User Backups” tab, and not “System Backups”. Hopefully there would be similar API for the System Backups, as well as the docs.
An Anonymous User 5 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Add API and docs for System Backups
Pterodactyl Panel have API to get list of backups and the detail ( https://pterodactyl-api-docs.netvpx.com/docs/api/client/backups#list-backups). In UltraServers, this is the “User Backups” tab, and not “System Backups”. Hopefully there would be similar API for the System Backups, as well as the docs.
An Anonymous User 5 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Option to transfer files/backups between servers
There could be option to transfer files or backups between 2 different servers from ultraservers. I recently bought server for testing purposes and Im really missing this function. I have to download the files to my pc and upload them to the other server, this could make it much faster by just clicking something like “import other server backup” or smth like that.
luibara2 8 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Option to transfer files/backups between servers
There could be option to transfer files or backups between 2 different servers from ultraservers. I recently bought server for testing purposes and Im really missing this function. I have to download the files to my pc and upload them to the other server, this could make it much faster by just clicking something like “import other server backup” or smth like that.
luibara2 8 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Not planned
Ability to purchase extra storage
Some people run worlds with large world borders, and don’t need much RAM. It’s a waste to pay for so much just for the storage.
An Anonymous User 12 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Not planned
Ability to purchase extra storage
Some people run worlds with large world borders, and don’t need much RAM. It’s a waste to pay for so much just for the storage.
An Anonymous User 12 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Rejected
Add "Billing Area" for subuser
Let the subuser be able to manage Billing Area (Whoever has the ownership of the service can decide if to enable or not)
An Anonymous User 14 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Rejected
Add "Billing Area" for subuser
Let the subuser be able to manage Billing Area (Whoever has the ownership of the service can decide if to enable or not)
An Anonymous User 14 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Option to download the archive as a zip in backup files
When viewing the backup files, add option to download the archive as a zip, it automatically downloads as tar.gz. I dont really care that much, but I still like .zip more
An Anonymous User 15 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Option to download the archive as a zip in backup files
When viewing the backup files, add option to download the archive as a zip, it automatically downloads as tar.gz. I dont really care that much, but I still like .zip more
An Anonymous User 15 days ago
💡 Feature Request
In Progress
Auto kill server on startup/shutdown if it takes too long
It needs to be smart and configurable startup and taking longer than 60s it should kill the server, try starting again then kill if it fails again and just stay shutdown on shutdown it should try waiting 60s otherwise force kill. restart it should try again after 60s as a minimum of waiting.
An Anonymous User 19 days ago
💡 Feature Request
In Progress
Auto kill server on startup/shutdown if it takes too long
It needs to be smart and configurable startup and taking longer than 60s it should kill the server, try starting again then kill if it fails again and just stay shutdown on shutdown it should try waiting 60s otherwise force kill. restart it should try again after 60s as a minimum of waiting.
An Anonymous User 19 days ago
💡 Feature Request
New Singapore node with the name 'nguyen'
little mean for others but I’d like to see one of the most common Vietnamese surnames being named on a (new) server node in Singapore, if thats possible lol
Aretzera 23 days ago
💡 Feature Request
New Singapore node with the name 'nguyen'
little mean for others but I’d like to see one of the most common Vietnamese surnames being named on a (new) server node in Singapore, if thats possible lol
Aretzera 23 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Not planned
Dedicated CPU cores
Just like how some server hosts offer Dedicated CPU cores you should be able to get an addon (just like Dedicated IP) for more performance.
An Anonymous User 27 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Not planned
Dedicated CPU cores
Just like how some server hosts offer Dedicated CPU cores you should be able to get an addon (just like Dedicated IP) for more performance.
An Anonymous User 27 days ago
💡 Feature Request
See and edit player specific enderchests & inventory
Basically, as the owner or admin if given the privilege you can edit players inventories through the following actions: drag around items in a player’s enderchest/inventory, add / remove ANY item, and therefore upgrade/remove enchantments all through the game panel. I may have missed some features that should be implemented alongside that could further help as well. Thanks. I have been told to make a post to see this feature implemented by an operator. image attached shows kinetic hosting’s implementation of this.
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
See and edit player specific enderchests & inventory
Basically, as the owner or admin if given the privilege you can edit players inventories through the following actions: drag around items in a player’s enderchest/inventory, add / remove ANY item, and therefore upgrade/remove enchantments all through the game panel. I may have missed some features that should be implemented alongside that could further help as well. Thanks. I have been told to make a post to see this feature implemented by an operator. image attached shows kinetic hosting’s implementation of this.
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Automatically install dependencies
When using like prism launcher or other minecraft launchers they usually automatically install the libs and apis that the mods require. Is it possible to also do this for the mod installer?
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Automatically install dependencies
When using like prism launcher or other minecraft launchers they usually automatically install the libs and apis that the mods require. Is it possible to also do this for the mod installer?
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Filter out client side mods
when browsing ultraservers mod installer, it shows also client side mods. if there was a way to filter out those it would be a lot easier
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Filter out client side mods
when browsing ultraservers mod installer, it shows also client side mods. if there was a way to filter out those it would be a lot easier
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Completed
Activity Features
Hello! I am the owner of a minecraft server and a client on ultraservers. I suggest to add a filter features on Activity! For example, filter by user, action, or even keywords. That would be very useful to check on a corrupted developers! Thankyou
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Completed
Activity Features
Hello! I am the owner of a minecraft server and a client on ultraservers. I suggest to add a filter features on Activity! For example, filter by user, action, or even keywords. That would be very useful to check on a corrupted developers! Thankyou
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
New Node in Asia Pacific
Since there has been an increase in users, especially customers availing UltraServer services in the Asia-Pacific region, would it be possible to open a new node in Hong Kong? Some ISPs are experiencing connectivity issues and higher latency when routing to the Singapore nodes. A Hong Kong node could significantly improve ping and overall stability for these users. I hope this can be considered. Thank you.
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
New Node in Asia Pacific
Since there has been an increase in users, especially customers availing UltraServer services in the Asia-Pacific region, would it be possible to open a new node in Hong Kong? Some ISPs are experiencing connectivity issues and higher latency when routing to the Singapore nodes. A Hong Kong node could significantly improve ping and overall stability for these users. I hope this can be considered. Thank you.
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Is it Possible to include LeviLamina?
Would it be possible to include LeviLamina as one of Bedrock Custom Server Software. It fairly does same with Endstone but it has more feature to add with the server. https://github.com/LiteLDev/LeviLamina
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Is it Possible to include LeviLamina?
Would it be possible to include LeviLamina as one of Bedrock Custom Server Software. It fairly does same with Endstone but it has more feature to add with the server. https://github.com/LiteLDev/LeviLamina
An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Rejected
unfiltered PORTS
hi, i suggest add a feature like creating a new port and pick an unfiltered ones
An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Rejected
unfiltered PORTS
hi, i suggest add a feature like creating a new port and pick an unfiltered ones
An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Search tool in File Editor
I would like you to update the File Editor's search tool to be similar to Visual Studio Code: Automatically navigate to the searched keyword without having to press Ctrl F multiple times Enable the use of Replace Text
An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Search tool in File Editor
I would like you to update the File Editor's search tool to be similar to Visual Studio Code: Automatically navigate to the searched keyword without having to press Ctrl F multiple times Enable the use of Replace Text
An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Completed
Different panel theme options/presets to make our panels more personalized
I’d like to see a dark mode/light mode or have specific accents like the statistics bar can be colored red instead of blue
An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Completed
Different panel theme options/presets to make our panels more personalized
I’d like to see a dark mode/light mode or have specific accents like the statistics bar can be colored red instead of blue
An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Search function.
Instead of a button to search, switch to a search bar on which we write the name of the file and the files below gets filtered as we write like on other hosts. The current Search button that opens on a pop-up is not productive especially when need to filter for multiple files (like macaw’s mods by searching for “mcw”)
An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Search function.
Instead of a button to search, switch to a search bar on which we write the name of the file and the files below gets filtered as we write like on other hosts. The current Search button that opens on a pop-up is not productive especially when need to filter for multiple files (like macaw’s mods by searching for “mcw”)
An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request