ADD GCASH PAY MENT
Hey filipinos like ultra i recommned adding gcash payment option its hard to buy using amex virtual card pls thankyou

An Anonymous User About 9 hours ago
π‘ Feature Request
ADD GCASH PAY MENT
Hey filipinos like ultra i recommned adding gcash payment option its hard to buy using amex virtual card pls thankyou

An Anonymous User About 9 hours ago
π‘ Feature Request
Adding New Vancouver/Seattle nodes
Iβd really like to see Canadian locations added, especially Vancouver. Iβm currently in Vancouver and getting ~80ms to the LA node, while I used to get ~15ms on a Hillsboro server with another host. There are a lot of players in Western Canada and America that would benefit from a closer location. Something like Vancouver or Seattle would make a big difference.

Ginga About 15 hours ago
π‘ Feature Request
Adding New Vancouver/Seattle nodes
Iβd really like to see Canadian locations added, especially Vancouver. Iβm currently in Vancouver and getting ~80ms to the LA node, while I used to get ~15ms on a Hillsboro server with another host. There are a lot of players in Western Canada and America that would benefit from a closer location. Something like Vancouver or Seattle would make a big difference.

Ginga About 15 hours ago
π‘ Feature Request
Pumpkin MC Server Software
Iβd like to know if this Pumpkin Server Software is able to get added as one of Minecraft server software version option? https://pumpkinmc.org/ https://github.com/Pumpkin-MC/Pumpkin/issues Though still in early development since last year

An Anonymous User 2 days ago
π₯ Feedback
Pumpkin MC Server Software
Iβd like to know if this Pumpkin Server Software is able to get added as one of Minecraft server software version option? https://pumpkinmc.org/ https://github.com/Pumpkin-MC/Pumpkin/issues Though still in early development since last year

An Anonymous User 2 days ago
π₯ Feedback
GCASH PAYMENT
pls add GCASH as option, cards aren't that popular here in Philippines, and it really hard to buy, we need to buy on some overpriced resellers of ultra servr js to get an available server.

An Anonymous User 4 days ago
π‘ Feature Request
GCASH PAYMENT
pls add GCASH as option, cards aren't that popular here in Philippines, and it really hard to buy, we need to buy on some overpriced resellers of ultra servr js to get an available server.

An Anonymous User 4 days ago
π‘ Feature Request
Gcash Payment
Hey Ultra, can I request something? Could you add GCash as a payment option for buying plans? A lot of us here donβt have PayPal or credit cards, especially since Iβm still a kid. It would really help make things more accessible for us. I hope you can consider this, thank you!

An Anonymous User 4 days ago
π‘ Feature Request
Gcash Payment
Hey Ultra, can I request something? Could you add GCash as a payment option for buying plans? A lot of us here donβt have PayPal or credit cards, especially since Iβm still a kid. It would really help make things more accessible for us. I hope you can consider this, thank you!

An Anonymous User 4 days ago
π‘ Feature Request
Web Socket SSL
The websocket SSL (same one provided for HTTP) doesnβt currently function, connections time out. Please consider fixing for the next update.

3add 9 days ago
π Bug Reports
Web Socket SSL
The websocket SSL (same one provided for HTTP) doesnβt currently function, connections time out. Please consider fixing for the next update.

3add 9 days ago
π Bug Reports
Progress bar and ETA when restoring backups
Hi would love to see a progress bar and ETA when you are restoring a backup instead of just being in the dark worrying when it will be done I think that would be really helpfull.

Koyee About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
Progress bar and ETA when restoring backups
Hi would love to see a progress bar and ETA when you are restoring a backup instead of just being in the dark worrying when it will be done I think that would be really helpfull.

Koyee About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
Add All-in-one java docker images
Here is my version of Java docker image, with all of the major JDK vendors like graalvm, temurin, zulu,β¦ all in one image, with each one has been stripped out excessive files like sample codes, etc and added support for Skullianβs mallocs for better memory allocation(though a bit rough) Iβd like to see if anybody would be interested in this solution and maybe ultraservers too

Aretzera About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
Add All-in-one java docker images
Here is my version of Java docker image, with all of the major JDK vendors like graalvm, temurin, zulu,β¦ all in one image, with each one has been stripped out excessive files like sample codes, etc and added support for Skullianβs mallocs for better memory allocation(though a bit rough) Iβd like to see if anybody would be interested in this solution and maybe ultraservers too

Aretzera About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
Middle East Region
Add a Middle East region which is really useful for much players who play in a Middle East region offering us 0-50 ping please

An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
Middle East Region
Add a Middle East region which is really useful for much players who play in a Middle East region offering us 0-50 ping please

An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
Advertising the new DB support
As something that is fairly unique to ultraservers, you have added support for redis and mongodb, this is something a lot of competitors lack and you should advertise it to your users,

not3add About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
Advertising the new DB support
As something that is fairly unique to ultraservers, you have added support for redis and mongodb, this is something a lot of competitors lack and you should advertise it to your users,

not3add About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
More Redis Versions
You only seem to support redis 7, there are a lot more open source and official redis images out there so why not offer them to users ( https://hub.docker.com/_/redis). Also there a quite a lot of open db posts which yall can close.

not3add About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
More Redis Versions
You only seem to support redis 7, there are a lot more open source and official redis images out there so why not offer them to users ( https://hub.docker.com/_/redis). Also there a quite a lot of open db posts which yall can close.

not3add About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
Remove server-hosting-comparison
https://ultraservers.com/server-hosting-comparison itβs very misleading and does not reflect the proper quality many hosts have. You canβt just represent and compare hosting purely on CPU and storage modal. The response to feedback on the misleading modal is not professional in the slightest.

An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
Remove server-hosting-comparison
https://ultraservers.com/server-hosting-comparison itβs very misleading and does not reflect the proper quality many hosts have. You canβt just represent and compare hosting purely on CPU and storage modal. The response to feedback on the misleading modal is not professional in the slightest.

An Anonymous User About 1 month ago
π‘ Feature Request
NBT editing of .dat and .mca files.
Suggesting the ability to edit.dat and.mca files in the files tab of the panel instead of having to download them and then use a tool like NBTExplorer. Suggesting maybe a warning to people editing these files before you can open them and/or forcing servers to be offline before editing these because it can cause corruption.

Nexusen38 About 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
NBT editing of .dat and .mca files.
Suggesting the ability to edit.dat and.mca files in the files tab of the panel instead of having to download them and then use a tool like NBTExplorer. Suggesting maybe a warning to people editing these files before you can open them and/or forcing servers to be offline before editing these because it can cause corruption.

Nexusen38 About 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Allow limited hybrid proxy usage for UltraServers-hosted proxies
Hi UltraServers team, I understand and agree with the intent behind the current proxy restrictions, especially preventing abuse of your DDoS protection and bandwidth to shield third-party infrastructure. That makes sense and is a real problem in the hosting space. That said, the current "all endpoints must be on UltraServers" rule effectively prevents legitimate hybrid Minecraft network setups. Many established networks (including mine) host their main production backends on UltraServers, while keeping smaller components such as lobbies, limbo, private, prototype, or development servers on lower-cost server (or VPS) providers. Databases and Redis are also often external for better resilience and portability. Because of this, I can't practically use an UltraServers-hosted Velocity proxy today (even as an additional entry point on multi-proxy setup) since players would be unable to reach those auxiliary servers without me violating the terms of service. This creates an all-or-nothing requirement that feels more like vendor lock-in than abuse prevention, and ironically discourages adoption of UltraServersβ proxy services (which could even help indirectly promotes UltraServers itself). Suggestion: consider an optional, restricted "hybrid proxy" allowance, for example: Allow a limited amount of off-network backend traffic (e.g. smaller bandwidth threshold). Apply monitoring, warnings, and enforcement if external routing becomes excessive or appears to be abuse (DDoS offloading, traffic laundering, etc.). This would still protect UltraServers from misuse, while supporting real-world network architectures and making UltraServers proxies viable for more advanced customers. I believe this kind of controlled allowance would strike a better balance between abuse prevention and flexibility. I'd even happily pay extra for this feature. Thanks for considering the feedback.

An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Allow limited hybrid proxy usage for UltraServers-hosted proxies
Hi UltraServers team, I understand and agree with the intent behind the current proxy restrictions, especially preventing abuse of your DDoS protection and bandwidth to shield third-party infrastructure. That makes sense and is a real problem in the hosting space. That said, the current "all endpoints must be on UltraServers" rule effectively prevents legitimate hybrid Minecraft network setups. Many established networks (including mine) host their main production backends on UltraServers, while keeping smaller components such as lobbies, limbo, private, prototype, or development servers on lower-cost server (or VPS) providers. Databases and Redis are also often external for better resilience and portability. Because of this, I can't practically use an UltraServers-hosted Velocity proxy today (even as an additional entry point on multi-proxy setup) since players would be unable to reach those auxiliary servers without me violating the terms of service. This creates an all-or-nothing requirement that feels more like vendor lock-in than abuse prevention, and ironically discourages adoption of UltraServersβ proxy services (which could even help indirectly promotes UltraServers itself). Suggestion: consider an optional, restricted "hybrid proxy" allowance, for example: Allow a limited amount of off-network backend traffic (e.g. smaller bandwidth threshold). Apply monitoring, warnings, and enforcement if external routing becomes excessive or appears to be abuse (DDoS offloading, traffic laundering, etc.). This would still protect UltraServers from misuse, while supporting real-world network architectures and making UltraServers proxies viable for more advanced customers. I believe this kind of controlled allowance would strike a better balance between abuse prevention and flexibility. I'd even happily pay extra for this feature. Thanks for considering the feedback.

An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Add API and docs for System Backups
Pterodactyl Panel have API to get list of backups and the detail ( https://pterodactyl-api-docs.netvpx.com/docs/api/client/backups#list-backups). In UltraServers, this is the βUser Backupsβ tab, and not βSystem Backupsβ. Hopefully there would be similar API for the System Backups, as well as the docs.

An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Add API and docs for System Backups
Pterodactyl Panel have API to get list of backups and the detail ( https://pterodactyl-api-docs.netvpx.com/docs/api/client/backups#list-backups). In UltraServers, this is the βUser Backupsβ tab, and not βSystem Backupsβ. Hopefully there would be similar API for the System Backups, as well as the docs.

An Anonymous User About 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Option to transfer files/backups between servers
There could be option to transfer files or backups between 2 different servers from ultraservers. I recently bought server for testing purposes and Im really missing this function. I have to download the files to my pc and upload them to the other server, this could make it much faster by just clicking something like βimport other server backupβ or smth like that.

luibara2 About 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Option to transfer files/backups between servers
There could be option to transfer files or backups between 2 different servers from ultraservers. I recently bought server for testing purposes and Im really missing this function. I have to download the files to my pc and upload them to the other server, this could make it much faster by just clicking something like βimport other server backupβ or smth like that.

luibara2 About 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Not planned
Ability to purchase extra storage
Some people run worlds with large world borders, and donβt need much RAM. Itβs a waste to pay for so much just for the storage.

An Anonymous User 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Not planned
Ability to purchase extra storage
Some people run worlds with large world borders, and donβt need much RAM. Itβs a waste to pay for so much just for the storage.

An Anonymous User 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Rejected
Add "Billing Area" for subuser
Let the subuser be able to manage Billing Area (Whoever has the ownership of the service can decide if to enable or not)

An Anonymous User 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request
Rejected
Add "Billing Area" for subuser
Let the subuser be able to manage Billing Area (Whoever has the ownership of the service can decide if to enable or not)

An Anonymous User 2 months ago
π‘ Feature Request